WaPo quietly suspended one of its top reporters last spring

The Washington Post quietly suspended one of its longest serving reporters, Paul Farhi, this past spring, in a move challenged by the union representing the paper’s reporters.

The suspension of Farhi, a media reporter who has for years been tasked with writing about the paper itself, came on or about March 10 and lasted for five days, during which he was not paid. According to a complaint to compel arbitration filed by the Washington-Baltimore News Guild in D.C. district court, the Post claimed that Farhi had "jeopardized the safety of a colleague as well as the ability of The Washington Post to report in a foreign country."

It is unclear from the complaint, which was obtained by POLITICO, what Farhi precisely did, but the filing suggests he was directly disciplined by the Post’s leadership for his coverage of the paper. The guild said he “accurately report[ed] internal Post news in the course of his duties as a media reporter.” On March 4, just days before the suspension, Farhi had tweeted that the Post was removing “bylines and datelines from stories produced by our journalists in Russia” in response to Vladimir Putin’s “threats against reporters in Russia.”

The Washington Post declined to comment.

Farhi, who has been employed by the Post as a staff writer since 1988, protested the suspension, with the guild filing a grievance on March 14. The Post disputed the grievance and, in a communique issued two weeks ago, argued that it was not arbitrable on grounds that the union’s collective bargaining agreement had expired. The guild’s complaint to the court is, in part, an attempt to get a declaration that the case is arbitrable under the past collective bargaining agreement.

The dispute with Farhi is another element of internal Washington Post drama that has spilled out into public. The paper recently fired reporter Felicia Sonmez after she publicly called out the masthead and several colleagues for creating a work climate that she said was hostile and misogynistic.

The guild did not immediately return a request for comment.